Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Front Pediatr ; 10: 926252, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36699291

RESUMO

Background: There is limited information available on fast and safe bedside tools that could help clinicians establish whether the pathological process underlying cases of wheezing is due to asthmatic exacerbation, asthmatic bronchitis, or pneumonia. The study's aim was to characterize Lung Ultrasound (LUS) in school-aged children with wheezing and evaluate its use for their follow-up treatment. Materials and methods: We carried out a cross-sectional study involving 68 consecutive outpatients (mean age 9.9 years) with wheezing and suggestive signs of an acute respiratory infection. An expert sonographer, blinded to all subject characteristics, clinical course, and the study pediatrician's diagnosis, performed an LUS after spirometry and before BDT. The severity of acute respiratory symptoms was determined using the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score. Results: The LUS was positive in 38.2% (26/68) of patients [12 (46.1%) with multiple B-lines, 24 (92.3%) with consolidation, and 22 (84.6%) with pleural abnormalities]. In patients with pneumonia, asthmatic bronchitis, and asthma, the percentages of those patients with a positive LUS were 100%, 57.7%, and 0%, respectively. Of note, patients with a positive LUS were associated with an increased need for hospital admission (30.8% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.001), administration of oxygen therapy (14.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.009), oral corticosteroids (84.6% vs. 19.0%, p < 0.001), and antibiotics (88.5% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.001); and a higher median value of PRAM score (4.0 (2.0-7.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0-5.0); p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our findings would suggest the use of LUS as a safe and cheap tool used by clinicians to define the diagnosis of school-aged children with wheezing of unknown causes.

3.
J Ultrasound ; 22(1): 5-12, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30484141

RESUMO

Urinary tract dilatation is identified sonographically in 1-2% of fetuses and reflects a spectrum of possible nephro-uropathies. There is significant variability in the clinical management of individuals with prenatal urinary tract dilatation to postnatal urinary pathologies, because of a lack of consensus and uniformity in defining and classifying urinary tract dilation. Ultrasonography is the first step to screen and diagnose kidneys and the urinary tract diseases of the children. The need for a correct ultrasound approach led to the realization of algorithms aimed at standardizing the procedures, the parameters and the classifications. Our objective was to highlight the strengths of the Classification of Urinary Tract Dilation (UTD) suggested by the Consensus Conference which took place in 2014 with the participation of eight Scientific Societies and was subsequently published on the Journal of Pediatric Urology. Before its spread out, the definition of UTD was not uniform and the ultrasonographic measurements were not clearly defined, leading to misunderstandings between physicians. The Classification by the Consensus Conference of 2014 represents a revolutionary tool for the diagnosis and management of UTD. Furthermore, the parameters suggested by the classification proposed are applicable for both prenatal and postnatal classification, ensuring a correct follow-up in children with UTD whose diagnosis had been already made during pregnancy.


Assuntos
Ultrassonografia , Sistema Urinário/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Urológicas/classificação , Doenças Urológicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Conferências de Consenso como Assunto , Meios de Contraste , Dilatação Patológica/classificação , Dilatação Patológica/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Sistema Urinário/crescimento & desenvolvimento
7.
J Ultrasound Med ; 36(8): 1687-1692, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28417478

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Point-of-care lung sonography has theoretical usefulness in numerous diseases; however clinical indications and the impact of this technique have not been fully investigated. We aimed to describe the current use of point-of-care lung sonography. METHODS: A 2-year prospective observational study was performed by pulmonologists in an Italian university hospital. Techniques, indications, consequences of lung sonography, and barriers to the examination were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1150 lung sonographic examinations were performed on 951 patients. The most common indications were diagnosis and follow-up of pleural effusion in 361 cases (31%), evaluation of lung consolidation (322 [28%]), acute heart failure (195 [17%]), guide to pleural procedures (117 [10%]), pneumothorax (54 [5%]) and acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (30 [3%]). The mean duration of the examination ± SD was 6 ± 4 minutes. The transducers most frequently used were convex (746 [65%]) and linear (161 [14%]), whereas in 205 examinations (18%), both transducers were used. According to the judgment of the caring clinician, 51% of the examinations were clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: Point-of-care lung sonography performed by pulmonologists is quick and feasible and could be widely used for different clinical indications with a potentially high clinical impact. The widespread use of this technique may have a relevant clinical impact in several indications.


Assuntos
Pneumopatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Ultrassonografia/instrumentação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...